Media Release: Pacific nuclear justice delegation call on PM to sign UN Nuclear Ban Treaty, as 80th and 60th anniversaries of Bikini and Mururoa tests mark a region still seeking justice

Media Release: Pacific nuclear justice delegation call on PM to sign UN Nuclear Ban Treaty, as 80th and 60th anniversaries of Bikini and Mururoa tests mark a region still seeking justice

CAMPAIGN NEWS:

Media Release: Pacific nuclear justice delegation call on PM to sign UN Nuclear Ban Treaty, as 80th and 60th anniversaries of Bikini and Mururoa tests mark a region still seeking justice

A delegation of Pacific nuclear survivors and advocates is in Canberra today to call on the Australian Prime Minister to sign and ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW). They are joined by Anangu-Yankunytjatjara woman and second-generation nuclear test survivor Karina Lester, and members of the Parliamentary Friends of the TPNW.

The visit falls during two significant anniversaries: July 1 marks 80 years since the first US test detonation at Bikini Atoll, Marshall Islands; July 2 marks 60 years since the first French test detonation at Mururoa Atoll, Mā’ohi Nui (French Polynesia). The anniversaries were acknowledged in a motion put forward on Monday by Labor member for Macquarie, Susan Templeman, who said: “With the legacy of nuclear testing still felt deeply in Australia, our region and across the world, we want nuclear weapons testing to be relegated to history. […] I will continue to advocate for the importance of sustained international commitment to nuclear non-proliferation, including the Treaty on Nuclear Non-Proliferation and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.”

“The experiences of the Marshall Islands and other Pacific communities remind us that decisions made by powerful nations can have consequences that last for generations. We ask the world to remember our history, stand with survivors, pursue nuclear disarmament, and place human dignity, justice, and peace at the centre of global decision-making.” — Samuel Barton, Marshall Islands Student Association (MISA)

“In a region increasingly militarised through AUKUS, the Quad and great-power competition, signing the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons would be a clear commitment to a nuclear-free Pacific and a genuine Ocean of Peace.” — Rev. James Bhagwan, General Secretary, Pacific Conference of Churches

“The Pacific demands and deserves complete freedom from nuclear weapons and their threat – not simply management, but total elimination. Australia has shown it can lead. Australia must match its history with urgent new action.” — Merewalesi Tuilau, Fiji Veterans and Families Association

“Our lands, oceans and bodies carry the nuclear radiation scars and are further at risk to the climate impacts. The Pacific has carried this legacy for 80 years. Now we ask Australia to help carry the responsibility for ensuring it is never repeated.” — Frances Namoumou, Ecumenical Animator, Ecological Stewardship and Climate Justice, Pacific Conference of Churches

Background notes:

  • The Parliamentary Friends of the TPNW is a cross-party forum, currently made up of 47 federal parliamentarians who meet and interact with nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation advocates on matters relating to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, and to discuss ways to ensure the Treaty’s success into the future.
  • Federal Labor committed to signing the TPNW in 2018 but has yet to do so. The delegation is highlighting the urgent need for signature ahead of the ALP National Conference later this month.The Canberra events are part of a wider lobby and advocacy tour to Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne running Monday 29 June to Friday 3 July, sharing testimony from communities affected by nuclear testing and calling for a Pacific that is decolonised, demilitarised, denuclearised and decarbonised.
  • Articles 6 and 7 of the TPNW on ‘victim assistance, environmental remediation, and international cooperation and assistance’seek to address ongoing and unresolved humanitarian, human rights, and environmental impacts from nuclear weapons.

BACK TO NEWS

Media Release: Defence Minister highlights nuclear risks – the challenge is to address them

Media Release: Defence Minister highlights nuclear risks – the challenge is to address them

CAMPAIGN NEWS:

Media Release: Defence Minister highlights nuclear risks – the challenge is to address them

Against a backdrop of growing international tension and conflict involving nuclear weapons states, Defence Minister Richard Marles told the National Press Club today that the world is on the “foothills of a new nuclear arms race” which “will drive elevated risks to Australia’s security and prosperity over the coming decade, increasing our exposure to conflict and coercion”.

 Minister Marles’ comments were used to justify a major increase in Defence spending and come amid Australia’s increasing defence engagement with the US and the UK—both nuclear weapon states. 

ICAN—the Australian civil society initiative that received the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize for its efforts in driving a global nuclear weapons ban treaty, the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW)—has called on the Australian government to urgently move to advance its long standing commitment to sign the TPNW as a clear and vital regional assurance and risk reduction step to lower nuclear tensions and temperatures.

The call comes as the federal Government continues to accept our AUKUS allies’ policy of “neither confirm, nor deny” as to whether their submarines and aircraft operating in Australian seas and skies are nuclear-capable or nuclear-armed.

“Minister Marles is right in identifying rising nuclear threats—now he and the federal Government need to take meaningful and effective action to reduce them,” said A/Prof Tilman Ruff AO, ICAN Australia co-founder.

“Australia must not facilitate nuclear weapons in our region and needs to send a clear message to our region that Australia does not support or endorse weapons of mass, indiscriminate destruction. Signing the TPNW is both Labor policy and common sense and is our best way to get rid of our worst weapons. When it comes to nuclear weapons Australians have both a right to know and a right to say No.

BACK TO NEWS

Media Release: As tensions rise, Australian and Pacific voices unite to keep nuclear weapons out of Australia

Media Release: As tensions rise, Australian and Pacific voices unite to keep nuclear weapons out of Australia

CAMPAIGN NEWS:

Media Release: As tensions rise, Australian and Pacific voices unite to keep nuclear weapons out of Australia

Against the current global uncertainty and the growing threat of Australia hosting nuclear weapons over 150 civil society organisations across Australia and the Pacific have united in a call for a nuclear weapons free Australia. 

Led by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (Australia), the No Nuclear Weapons in Australia Declaration calls on the Albanese government to sign and ratify the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) without delay, as renewed global threats push the risk of nuclear conflict to its highest level in decades.

Groups representing millions of people including the Community and Public Sector Union, Nurses and Midwifery Union, Australian Conservation Foundation, Amnesty International, Uniting Church, Pacific Elders Voice, Medical Association for the Prevention of War, and many others have endorsed the call.

“The union movement has always stood against war, and we’re proud to stand with civil society to keep nuclear weapons out of Australia and uphold our national commitment to disarmament,” explained Jiselle Hanna, Branch Secretary from the Community and Public Sector Union. 

The move to keep Australia nuclear weapons-free has reached a critical point with the planned hosting of US nuclear-capable B-52 bombers and potentially nuclear-armed submarines under the AUKUS agreement significantly heightens local risks. These developments not only increase the danger of a catastrophic nuclear accident on Australian soil but makes Australia a potential target for adversaries.

Central to this declaration is a collective demand for Australia to uphold the spirit and letter of the Rarotonga Treaty. As a founding signatory to the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone, Australia has a permanent obligation to ensure our region remains shielded from the existential threat of nuclear weapons and the horror of renewed testing. 

“As Australia deepens its military integration under arrangements like AUKUS, Pacific civil society is raising a clear call that these decisions must not undermine the integrity of our nuclear-free region,” said Epeli Lesuma, Nuclear Justice and Demilitarisation Campaigner for the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG). 

“Australia has a responsibility to uphold both the spirit and letter of its commitments under the Treaty of Rarotonga, and to reinforce those commitments by signing and ratifying the TPNW,” he continued.

Additional quotes:

“The massive scale of this declaration sends a clear message that Australians will not accept a slide toward Australia losing its nuclear weapon-free status. To truly protect our future and the Pacific, Australia must demonstrate leadership by signing and ratifying the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons now. We cannot advocate for a rules-based order while staying outside of the only global treaty that bans the world’s most destructive weapons.”

— Janet Craven, Director, ICAN Australia

“The only way to avoid nuclear catastrophe and to discourage more states from seeking their own nuclear weapons, is to uphold and vigorously defend international law and to implement the TPNW—a treaty which seeks to ban nuclear weapons for all states. In moments of crisis such as these, the temptation is to close ranks. The responsibility of middle powers like Australia, however, is in fact the opposite: to insist that the rules matter most when they are most inconvenient.”

— ICAN Co-Chairs, Marianne Hanson & Tara Gutman

“The commitment to AUKUS further locks Australia into the unpredictable war games of our allies. It is time more citizens spoke out against the loss of Australian sovereignty and demanded our nation be independent in managing our own foreign and defence policies and they must be NUCLEAR FREE.”

— Margaret Reynolds, Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (Australia)

“Nuclear weapons represent an unacceptable threat to human health and wellbeing—no health system could respond to their catastrophic impacts, and prevention is the only cure. We stand with the global health community in calling for Australia to reject nuclear weapons and commit to a future grounded in disarmament, transparency, and the protection of life.”

— Genevieve Dean, Australian Medical Students’ Association

BACK TO NEWS

Israel wants to destroy Iran’s nuclear program. But should it have nuclear weapons itself? ICAN Co-Chair, Marianne Hanson, for The Conversation

Israel wants to destroy Iran’s nuclear program. But should it have nuclear weapons itself? ICAN Co-Chair, Marianne Hanson, for The Conversation

CAMPAIGN NEWS:

Israel wants to destroy Iran’s nuclear program. But should it have nuclear weapons itself? ICAN Co-Chair, Marianne Hanson, for The Conversation

Israel wants to destroy Iran’s nuclear program. But should it have nuclear weapons itself?

Marianne Hanson, The University of Queensland

Israel’s avowed goal in the Middle East war is to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Yet, the double standard associated with this is hardly sustainable in the long run.

The worst-kept secret in the world of nuclear politics is that Israel possesses a formidable arsenal of nuclear weapons. It began developing these in the 1950s and reached a fully operational capability by the late 1960s.

Although Israel refuses to confirm or deny this fact, arms control organisations have assessed that the country has some 80–90 nuclear weapons.

In recent days, Iran targeted Israel’s nuclear facility in the southern town of Dimona, injuring more than 100 people. The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) called for restraint to avoid a “nuclear accident”.

A program shrouded in secrecy

There is much evidence to support the existence of Israel’s arsenal.

In 1963, then-Deputy Defence Minister Shimon Peres famously stated Israel would not be the first to “introduce” nuclear weapons to the Middle East. What this actually meant was spelled out a few years later by the Israeli ambassador to the US. For a weapon to be “introduced”, he said, it needed to be tested and publicly declared. Merely possessing them did not constitute introducing them.

Several whistleblower accounts, intelligence reports and satellite imagery confirm the extent of the Israeli program and its capabilities.

More recently, Amichai Eliyahu, a far-right minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, alluded to using nuclear weapons in Gaza – a tacit acknowledgement of Israel’s capabilities. He was later reprimanded by Netanyahu.

And in 2024, Avigdor Lieberman, a former defence and foreign minister, threatened to “use all the means at our disposal” to prevent an Iranian nuclear weapon. He added: “It should be clear at this stage it is not possible to prevent nuclear weapons from Iran by conventional means.”

It is important to remember that Israel not only developed its nuclear weapons in secret – employing subterfuge, misleading claims, and even the suspected theft of bomb-grade nuclear material from the United States – it has also rejected international inspections of its facilities and refused to join the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). This treaty has been signed by almost every state in the world.

Concerns over Iran’s program

Iran, meanwhile, has never had a nuclear weapon, though its program has been the source of international concern for more than a decade.

In 2015, Iran signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (also known as the Iran nuclear deal) with the US, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom and Germany, which imposed restrictions on its nuclear program in return for sanctions relief. This included inspections by IAEA monitors.

However, Trump scuppered the plan in 2018. Since then, Iran has enriched uranium to levels well above those needed for its energy program. And last year, the IAEA said Iran was non-compliant with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations for failing to provide full answers about its program.

But since the current war began, US and international officials have confirmed that Iran was not close to developing a nuclear weapon and did not pose an imminent nuclear threat to the US or Israel.

In short, there is no truth to the claim, made for almost 40 years by Israel, that Iran is “weeks away” from acquiring the bomb. The IAEA made clear two years ago that a nuclear weapon requires “many other things independently from the production of the fissile material”.

Getting close to nuclear threshold status, but stopping short of developing an actual bomb, likely provides a fall-back position for Iran. If Iran were to feel pushed or threatened, it could, in time, accelerate its energy program towards a weapons program. Or it could use this enriched uranium as leverage in negotiations with the US.

Nuclear powers need to show restraint

This brings us back to a major question: can double standards about who can and cannot develop a nuclear weapon be sustained indefinitely?

Israel’s nuclear arsenal has been tacitly accepted by the West, implying there are “right hands” and “wrong hands” for nuclear weapons. But this is a risky and ultimately unsustainable position.

As Australia’s Canberra Commission noted in 1996, as long as any one state has nuclear weapons, other states will want them, too.

This is precisely why many states voted in 2017 to adopt the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The treaty’s purpose is to make the possession, threat and use of nuclear weapons illegitimate for all states, not just for some, on the basis of international humanitarian law.

Signed by 99 states so far, the treaty recognises that nuclear weapons promise massive destruction to civilians and combatants alike, and that even a “small” nuclear war will cause catastrophic damage.

At the end of the day, a consistent approach to nuclear weapons is more likely to prevent nuclear proliferation (by Iran or other states) than the current mess, where some states are tacitly permitted to have these weapons (and wage war on others), while other countries are not.

It is possible we are at a tipping point when it comes to nuclear proliferation, with some countries suspected of wanting to develop nuclear weapon capabilities. This includes US allies South Korea and Japan.

Are the nuclear weapons states ultimately willing to accept the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and disarm in the interest of global peace and security? If they don’t, then the current trajectory of keeping one’s own nuclear weapons and waging war against states that don’t have them will only weaken an already crumbling rules-based international order.The Conversation

Marianne Hanson, Associate Professor of International Relations, The University of Queensland

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

BACK TO NEWS

Welcome to our New Director, Janet Craven!

Welcome to our New Director, Janet Craven!

CAMPAIGN NEWS:

Welcome to our New Director, Janet Craven!

We are excited to introduce Janet Craven as the new Director of ICAN Australia to help steer the ship during these tumultuous times!

Janet brings deep experience in public affairs, humanitarian diplomacy and weapons treaties. Most recently, she served as Public Affairs Manager for the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation to the European Union, NATO and Belgium, supporting dialogue on International Humanitarian Law and relevant weapons instruments, including the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention and the Political Declaration on the Use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas.

Her background spans:

  • Senior roles with international humanitarian and development organisations
  • Work with the Irish Red Cross and the ICRC across Europe and Australian Red Cross across Australia and the Asia Pacific region
  • Advising in state government and leading campaign teams
  • Earlier work in Melbourne with community and humanitarian groups

Janet has recently returned to Naarm and is ready to lead ICAN Australia at a pivotal moment for nuclear disarmament.

We’re so glad she’s on board.

Welcome Janet!

    BACK TO NEWS